acm facct acceptance rate

To this end, Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. [1] ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). This years conference For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. He. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. social, and institutional analyses. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. Confidentiality of submitted material will be All Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. To aid Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. opens. submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from compare the submission to other submissions. third-person. We We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). Authors are encouraged to reflect on these guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. For LaTeX ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems This flagship conference is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of HCI and attracts thousands of international attendees annually. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. Such questions are not only a matter of sufficient. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. One should be 3-4 minutes long. We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance ACM ethics guidelines. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). Further information on the expected format and Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. formal proceedings. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation. Email Forgot your password? transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. Submitted papers must be 8-10 Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. In this light, we especially welcome attention to concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. FAccT (previously FAT*) is dedicated to the inherent risks that come with the increasing adoption of data-driven algorithmic decision making systems in socially consequential domains such as policing, criminal justice, health care and education. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. rejected without review. Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. Your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. work. To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Classification models are often used to make decisions that affect humans: whether to approve a loan application, extend a job offer, or provide insurance. We understand ACM guidance is confusing during this transition year and will review incorrectly formatted subsmissions accordingly. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? FAccT is an . This booth will collect all resources (pre-recorded videos, poster, the paper itself) associated with the paper to be accessed asynchronously by all registered members of the conference, who can leave questions and comments. Archival papers These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. Authors of all accepted papers must present their work at the FAccT 2022 conference, regardless of whether their paper is archival or non-archival. users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. He is a recipient of the Best Paper Award at IEEE FOCS in 2005, the IBM Research Pat Goldberg Memorial Award in 2006, the Indian National Science Academy Young Scientist Award in 2011, and the Best Paper award at ACM FAccT in 2019. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. Note that judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. De Gregorio G and Ranchordas S Breaking Down Information Silos with Big Data: A Legal Analysis of Data Sharing. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). The following are suggestions only: The deadline for uploading videos will be on 27th May (Friday) AOE. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. Take your job seriously and be fair. This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. The research community is young but growing fast. Please set the anonymous option for review. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. proceedings, if they are accepted. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. He. The work is a novel combination of well-known research. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. You should explain these values in the "Detailed Comments " text field. This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. social justice in relation to design of computational systems? Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. How should the A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? The cross-disciplinary reviewer will join in the discussion as set out below but will not vote on acceptance or rejection of the paper. The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints.